Well firstly I should explain why it’s been nearly two months since my last
blog…
I haven’t disappeared entirely, and I still think about blogging quite a lot; but sadly I have had the great misfortune to change my internet service provider (ISP) and for some reason the new network says an emphatic “no” to WordPress admin.
Therefore, my first back-online blog is going to be (yes, you guessed it) a rant about rubbish service in the technology sector.
I’m currently connected through AOL at my Dad’s house. Gus and I moved into a very small flat at the end of March when we finally rid ourselves of “house of the thousand collapsed ceilings” and settled in for the long wait for the keys to our new place, which we expect to move into at the end of June.
At the time we moved, Gus thought it would be a good idea to switch our ISP to 3 so we could get their mobile broadband package, enabling us (or so we naively thought…) to sit outside in the sunshine and enjoy speedy internet access wherever might take our fancy.
Oh dear; as my happily AOL-powered Dad might write in a satisfactorily and timeously delivered email “Ye’re no often right, but ye’re wrang again!”
Take this from someone who’s spent the last 7 weeks in a microflat, with nothing to do but look silly stuff up on the internet (business activities have been somewhat suspended lately – but more about that in a future post) – 3 Mobile Broadband is PANTS.
In fact it may not even be effective enough to be called PANTS, because at least PANTS have a function beyond causing their owners to spend inordinate and unreasonable amounts of time on the phone to call centres where staff have clearly been specifically trained to empathise with angry callers, because that’s the only type of call they ever receive.
I lose connection to the internet at least 2-3 times every day. This can sometimes be addressed by rebooting the router 12-15 times, but more often it results in an expensive and frustrating call to 3 technical support, only to be told that there’s no indication of any reason for the fault, and therefore no way to have it fixed.
However, at the same time as being incandescent with rage during said phone calls, I can’t help but be reluctantly impressed with the fabulous textbook examples of active listening and “mirrored empathy” I receive from the call centre telephonists:
Caller: I’ve lost internet connection again. That’s the third time today. I’ve tried rebooting my router and restarting my laptop, but it’s not helping. I’m really getting fed up with this now.
Telephonist: Thank you for your comments. I understand your frustration Mrs Gunn. Your internet connection isn’t working for the third time today, you’ve tried rebooting and it is still not working. I can appreciate that you’re not happy.
Caller: (Patiently) Well, is there anything you can do? I work from home, so I need a reliable internet connection, which this clearly isn’t.
Telephonist: I understand your frustration Mrs Gunn. Your internet connection isn’t reliable for you at the moment, and you need this because you work from home.
Caller: (Extra patiently) I can see that you understand the problem. Can you tell me if there’s anything you can do to have it fixed?
Telephonist: So, your internet connection has gone down, is that correct?
Caller: (Extra, extra patiently, with a hint of tiredness) Yes, that is correct.
Telephonist: Did you know that the majority of connection problems with 3 Mobile Broadband can be addressed by restarting the router and switching your laptop off then back on?
Caller emits an inarticulate sound as if suddenly strangled.
Telephonist: I’m sorry Mrs Gunn, I did not understand you. Did you know that the majority of connection problems with….
Telephonist hears the sound of a window being opened. The line is filled with the rushing of air and the rapidly diminishing sound of screamed obscenities.
A thud and some brief sounds of splintering plastic. Then silence.
So despite their evidently comprehensive training in how to sympathetically and considerately assist upset, internet-less clients, 3 Mobile Broadband’s technical support are in fact about as much use as an inflatable dartboard. I’m still no further forward with my connectivity issues, and beyond a paltry £5 credit to our account (which I have no doubt has been swallowed up by mobile phone bills for calls routed via the Middle East) I’ve had nothing except a sympathetic verbal repetition of my problems.
Of course, when raising the question of whether I should in all fairness be held to a contract for a service that doesn’t serve, I received the inevitable notification of enormous disconnection fees should I terminate early. I did ask to speak to a manager, but was told I’d receive a callback within 24 hours, which of course I’m still waiting for two and a half weeks later.
Not being one to shrink at a challenge though, I will shortly be embarking on a campaign of irate and over-articulate letters to 3 customer care. If I can’t have a reliable internet connection, then I can at least have the satisfaction of wasting their time as well as mine until they agree to cancel the contract without penalty.
So a stern warning for anybody looking for a new ISP; do not under any circumstances consider using 3 Mobile Broadband, unless you plan to sign up and then immediately cancel the contract under the 14 day cooling-off period, just to make an administratively inconvenient point about the unfairness of consumers having to pay for rubbish service and repeated viewings of “Internet Explorer cannot display the web page” error screens.
Technology? Pah!
Two brands. Both alike in dignity.
September 11, 2009 by Elaine Gunn
Or not, as the case may be.
It’s been a while since I blogged last; I’ve been settling in to the new house, enjoying having more to do since I took a part-time job, and growing a small, but very demanding human being.
I’m nearly 28 weeks now, so the third trimester is just round the corner (Sunday, to be exact). I finally have a bit of a bump, so have passed the stage where I just look like I’ve been over-indulging my pie habit, and have been searching for any maternity trousers whose gussets can be trusted not to descend uncomfortably to knee-level with the slightest physical activity. It’s not easy…
Anyway, I was flicking through a maternity catalogue the other day, and found an advert
for “Hot Milk” lingerie (see image aside) who design and sell underwear for pregnant ladies such as myself.
Or perhaps not exactly like myself, but pregnant ladies nonetheless.
Let me make it clear at this stage, I am in no way dissing their product – in fact I saw some of their line in Edinburgh’s finest West End mum-to-be outlet Vanilla Bloom yesterday and can honestly say it’s lovely – very pretty, very cleverly made, and a million miles from the utilitarian passion-killers that I’ve been forced to invest in so far.
I just don’t know what their brand manager thinks they’re up to with this Little Red Riding Hood advert?
Firstly, yes I can accept that it’s generally considered sexy to position a nubile young lady as a little girl – that’s not really much of a surprise given the success of kiddie-fiddler-fodder like St Trinian’s et al. But introducing pregnancy into that field? Is that not just the teeniest bit, erm, disturbing?
Surely pregnancy is something to be considered womanly, not girly? While our bodies are changing at a rate unprecedented in the average woman’s experience, should we not be allowed to retain our claim to womanly sexiness, rather than being forced into the same media-led rat race for youth and immaturity as non-pregnant females?
It’s just a contradiction in every way. Yes, we know that the Western ideal of female beauty tends towards the juvenile rather than the mature, but positioning pregnant women as little girls in order to make them sexy? Clearly the creative behind the Hot Milk ad thought there was a nice juxtaposition there, but to me it’s just plain mean. How can we possibly live up to that expectation?
The fundamental mistake (in my humble opinion) is that the marketers involved have assumed that pregnant women are, or want to be, sexy – in the same way as non-pregnant women. Now I’m not for a minute suggesting that pregnancy precludes sexiness for anybody – but I do feel strongly that it’s a totally different kind from the generic, androgynous (apart from massive hair extensions, naturally) waif-like attractiveness of the ideal. Stand up Girls Aloud, your time is up…
Pregnancy sexiness comes from roundness, curves, glowing skin, sparkling eyes, fruitfulness, contentment and the occasional ill-concealed cheeky burp. It’s being comfortable with who you are and what your body is doing, excitement for the future, and the wisdom that comes with knowing that whatever weirdo and uncomfortable thing your body is doing today, it’s worth it – because it’s helping to create a little miracle.
Anyway, apart from anything else, the Hot Milk advert lost all credibility when I realised that they’d crimped Little Red Riding Hood’s hair. So now we have an inappropriately fetishist contradiction in femininity with a (shriek) nasty 80s ‘do.
Not cool, guys. Not cool at all.
Having said all that, I do have to in principle applaud what they’re trying to do – i.e. give pregnant women a decent choice in pretty undies, and encourage them to remember they’re still sexy. Have a look at their website – the product is seriously good. http://www.hotmilklingerie.co.nz
I’ve done a bit of rambling now – this was meant to be a well-structured comparison of how two brands got it horribly wrong. But I’ve gone all feminist again and run out of room (and I suspect, reader patience) so I’ll make the second brand assassination a quick one.
My Mum and Dad joined a gym in Inverness recently. You know what it’s called?
Fit 4 Less.
Yes, that’s right – if you join this gym, you’ll be fit for less.
I’m waiting with bated breath for the inevitable free membership deal, surely to be entitled “Fit 4 Nothing”.
It’s genius I tell you, flipping genius!
Posted in Brand/marketing commentary, Ranting | Tagged brand positioning, hot milk lingerie, pregnancy lingerie, sexiness, sexualisation of women, when marketeers get it wrong | 2 Comments »